About the Editor

Kevin McDevitt, CFA is an editorial director for Morningstar's Fund Research group. He covers funds from the BlackRock, American, Templeton, and PIMCO fund families, among others, primarily in international equity and fixed income asset classes.

McDevitt originally joined Morningstar in 1995. He was a mutual fund analyst from 1996 to 1999 and also held positions within the company's international group, Morningstar Associates, and Morningstar Investment Services.

McDevitt left Morningstar in 2002 to pursue a master's degree in business administration from Washington University. After earning his graduate degree, he worked as an associate equity analyst at AG Edwards. Most recently, he managed trust portfolios at AG Edwards, which became Wachovia, and is now Wells Fargo. He rejoined Morningstar in 2009.

McDevitt holds a bachelor's degree in finance from the College of William & Mary. He also holds the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation.

American Funds Report Objective
Morningstar's American Funds Reports helps you find the best and avoid the worst funds in the American lineup. Morningstar's lead analysts on each fund family write the family's report.

 
About the Editor
Christopher Davis is a senior mutual fund analyst for Morningstar, covering the Fidelity, Baron, Columbia Acorn, and First Pacific Advisors fund families. He edits the monthly newsletter, Morningstar Fidelity Fund Family Report. Davis also specializes in dividend-focused, tax-managed, health care, and behavioral finance funds. He joined Morningstar in 1999 as a data analyst.

Davis holds a bachelor's degree in economics and political science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Fidelity Funds Report Objective
Morningstar's Fidelity Funds Reports helps you find the best and avoid the worst funds in the Fidelity lineup. Morningstar's lead analysts on each fund family write the family's report.

 
About the Editor
Dan Culloton is an associate director fund analysis for Morningstar and editor of the Vanguard Fund Family Report monthly online newsletter. He covers the Vanguard, Dodge & Cox, and Davis Selected Advisor fund families. He edited the first Morningstar ETFs 150 reference guide for ETFs. Before joining the company in 1999, he was a business writer for The Daily Herald and was a recipient of the Chicago Headline Club's Peter Lisagor Award in 1998.

Culloton holds a bachelor's degree in English and journalism from Marquette University and a master's degree in public affairs reporting from the University of Illinois at Springfield.

Vanguard Funds Report Objective
Morningstar's Vanguard Funds Reports helps you find the best and avoid the worst funds in the Vanguard lineup. Morningstar's lead analysts on each fund family write the family's report.

 
 
May 16, 2012
Welcome !
Kevin McDevitt
Fund Favorites & Red Flags: American Funds, Dodge & Cox, T. Rowe Price, Yacktman

If 2011 was the year of the dividend-seeking investor, 2012 has so far provided a sequel.

During the past year, investors had many reasons to favor blue-chip dividend-payers. Collectively, the companies that comprise the S&P 500 Index offered a higher yield than the 10-year Treasury bond; for income-hungry types, the large-value category was even more attractive. At the close of February 2012, the category's average yield of 1.4% topped the large-growth and large-blend norms by 115 and 40 basis points, respectively.

Investors reduced their domestic-stock exposure across all categories in the trailing year, with large-cap funds among the hardest hit. The $15 billion pulled from large-value funds, though, seems modest in comparison with the $45 billion exodus the large-growth category experienced. (Large-blend funds fared slightly better but still suffered some $13 billion in redemptions during the period.)

Despite torrential large-cap outflows overall, however, large-value funds with the highest yields attracted assets. While investors yanked more than $9 billion from funds that ranked in the category's lowest-yielding decile, they poured almost the same amount--$8.6 billion--into funds that placed in the category's top decile by yield.

At least in the short term, investors largely got it right. In the trailing 12 months through February 2012, the top-quartile of large-value performers averaged a 1.82% 12-month dividend yield and returned 8.9%. Conversely, the bottom-quartile of large-value performers averaged a lower 1.1% yield and lost 2.1% during the period.

Many of those bottom-quartile performers had above-average stakes in the financials and energy sectors, which bore the brunt of the market's August 2011 decline. Dodge & Cox Stock DODGX struggled with its own financial slug as well as a notable stake in Hewlett-Packard HPQ. T. Rowe Price Equity Income PRFDX was hampered partially by its above-average stake in the energy sector, though investors should expect the fund to continue its workmanlike process of consistently outpacing its peer-group average over the long haul. With lower exposure to financials, Yacktman YACKX and American Funds Washington Mutual AWSHX treated investors to a customarily smooth ride. Respectively, those funds suffered just 50% and 72% of the S&P 500 Index's declines during the trailing 12 months.

All told, the five Gold-rated large-value funds continue to offer capable management and disciplined strategies, making them promising candidates for the long haul.

Favorite: American Funds American Mutual AMRMX
Morningstar Rating: 4 Stars
One-Year Return: 4.89%
Expense Ratio: 0.62% 

Favorite: American Funds Washington Mutual AWSHX
Morningstar Rating: 3 Stars
One-Year Return: 6.22%
Expense Ratio: 0.63% 

Favorite: Dodge & Cox Stock DODGX
Morningstar Rating: 3 Stars
One-Year Return: -1.07%
Expense Ratio: 0.52% 

Favorite: T. Rowe Price Equity Income PRFDX
Morningstar Rating: 4 Stars
One-Year Return: 1.48%
Expense Ratio: 0.68% 

Favorite: Yacktman YACKX
Morningstar Rating: 5 Stars
One-Year Return: 6.05%
Expense Ratio: 0.80% 

Christopher Davis
Who's Running the Most Money?

 Fidelity Contrafund FCNTX manager Will Danoff is back to running a more than $100 billion threshold once more. A few years ago, Fidelity handed one of Danoff's three funds to another manager in order to cut his workload. However, his continued success, a market rally, and the inflows that his funds have drawn have him managing more than $100 billion combined again in Contrafund and  Fidelity Advisor New Insights FNIAX, which have $84 billion and $19 billion, respectively. Contrafund was one of the industry's largest funds 15 years ago (with approximately $25 billion in assets at that time). Even with its heft, the fund has one of the best 15-year records to show for it, a 9.25% annualized gain.

Danoff is the exception rather than the norm, however. To put Danoff's task in perspective, I pulled together a list of solo managers running actively managed domestic-stock funds and ranked it by assets. In fact, Danoff is running twice as much as the next manager on the list, Steve Wymer at $44 billion in  Fidelity Growth Company FDGRX, and three times as much as number three on the list, Rob Bartolo of  T. Rowe Price Growth Stock PRGFX. 

My first thought was that it's really, really hard to achieve what Danoff has done. Running really large sums has pummeled many good managers. My second thought is that it will be a challenge for all of the managers on this list to run their funds over the coming years. The good news is many have strategies and experience that give them a pretty good chance of continued success. That hasn't always been the case.



Asset bloat causes a number of problems for a fund manager. It reduces the exposure a fund can gain to smaller, less-liquid stocks. It's not uncommon to see a fund have tremendous success with small-, mid-, and large-cap stocks only to grow so large that it has to be almost exclusively large cap. In addition, the costs of trading stocks go up because the fund will have to trade more stocks just to get an equivalent position--so that it is driving up its purchase price and down its selling price. Even making those adjustments, managers often have to spread out their portfolio among more names so that their favorite names have less impact and they have to do more research on more companies.

To understand just how tough this task really is, check out Table 2, which lists the managers running the most money solo 10 years ago. Six of the funds on that list have gone on a forced diet as they are smaller today than they were 10 years ago even though the stock market has gained an annualized 4.5% over that time.  Fidelity Magellan FMAGX has shrunk by $55 billion,  Fidelity Growth & Income FGRIX is down $26 billion,  Janus JANDX is down $14 billion,  Fidelity Equity-Income FEQIX is down $12 billion,  Fidelity Blue Chip Growth FBGRX is down $5 billion, and  Fidelity Dividend Growth FDGFX is down $7 billion from that time. Those six funds also have had at least one manager change over that 10-year period. The changes and asset drop tell me investors haven't had a good experience.


 

The performance figures back that up. Four of the funds suffered bottom-quartile performance over the past 10 years. One, Fidelity Growth & Income, actually is in the red for the past 10 years. On the plus side, four funds cracked the top quartile led by Danoff.

The results underline the importance of fund companies closing funds before they grow to unmanageable sizes as there aren't enough Will Danoffs to go around. Of those in the current top 10, only three are closed to new investors. I'd rather see more of them closed, but U.S.-equity funds are not drawing big sums of inflows at the moment, so the time to close may come at a later date. For example, Contrafund just moved to positive flows this year. 

From an investor's perspective, you should be particularly wary of manager changes at giant funds. It also helps to consider how well a strategy can be adapted to larger assets, how strong the resources are behind a fund, and a firm's track record of closing.

Asset size is a real handicap, so you should raise the bar before buying or sticking with a big fund with a solo manager. 


FundInvestor Newsletter
FundInvestor Want to hear more from the mutual fund experts? Subscribe to Morningstar FundInvestor for exclusive research, coveted analysis and proprietary ratings—neatly packaged and delivered to your inbox. One-Year Digital Subscription

12 Issues | $119
Premium Members: $109

Easy Checkout
Daniel Culloton
Fund Favorites & Red Flags: Mutual and Vanguard

Funds focused on developed Europe gained a healthy 14.0% for the year to date through March 15, but they have plenty of ground to make up given their 12.8% average loss in 2011. Much of the pain occurred during last year's third quarter, when concerns over Europe's debt woes and a worsening global economic slowdown hurt most all equity funds. Europe-stock funds' average loss of 23.1% for the three-month period was the most severe, though.

The only developed Europe-stock fund to eke out a gain in 2011 was Virtus Greater European Opportunities VGEAX. Its 0.94% finish was due in part to its healthy exposure to defensive, consumer-related names, including British American Tobacco and Unilever, which buoyed returns during some of the toughest months of the year.  Invesco European Growth AEDAX had the next best showing, losing 3.6% for the year. Its healthy exposure to consumer staples stocks helped it hold up better than most, as did its relatively light stake in hard-hit banks and financials in general.

It was tougher sledding for small-cap oriented funds, particularly in the difficult third quarter. As a result, funds such as  DFA Continental Small Company DFCSX and Royce European Smaller Companies RISCX were down by 23.5% and 20.3%, respectively, for the year. These offerings have been among the small peer group's better performers in 2012's rebound, however, as have those with riskier profiles. Henderson European Focus HFEAX is up 24% for the year to date through March 15, landing it ahead of all its peers, thanks to its significant skew toward materials, energy, and consumer cyclicals stocks.

Favorite: Mutual European MEURX
Morningstar Rating: 4 Stars
One-Year Return: -7.96%
Expense Ratio: 1.11% 

Favorite: Vanguard European Stock Index VEURX
Morningstar Rating: 3 Stars
One-Year Return: -15.10%
Expense Ratio: 0.26% 

 
Contact Us | © Morningstar Fund Family Reports
Customer Support
Product Support
Inquiries regarding your subscription such as address changes, missing/damaged issues, etc.
Phone: 1-800-957-6021 | Mon-Fri 8:30AM-5:00PM
Inquiries regarding technical issues such as logging in or downloading
Phone: 1-312-424-4288 | Mon-Fri 7AM-7PM
E-mail: newslettersupport@morningstar.com
Product Sales
Inquiries regarding your subscription renewal, billing or to learn about other Morningstar investment publications and resources
Phone: 1-866-608-9570 | Mon-Fri 8AM-5PM
E-mail: ussales@morningstar.com
Contact Your Editor